Even if you doubled this number, more Shermans were sent over. For comparison, more Shermans were sent to the Soviet Union, than the entire production run of all tiger variants, combined. The M4A2 was the most popular tank of the lend lease program, with over 4000 examples being sent from the US. For the Sherman, saying its use was limited is a understatement. Yet, they were pressed into combat service, unlike the more numerous Mk. Of the +1000 Spitfires sent to the Soviets, only 143 were Mk. Your claim about the vehicles being used in a limited capacity is only true for the Spitfire. If I wanted the premium Sherman during the recent sale, I would've bought it. I suggested the Spitfire and the Sherman because I believe they are interesting vehicles that should be in the tree because of their military service and overall good performance. Before making a accusation, make sure its true before posting it. I think it is a poor idea to add unnecessary aircraft that are redundant in roles just because you didn't buy it 4 years ago or whenever the anniversary was. This use at a limited capacity combined with their export status are what made them premiums in the first place. ![]() You are just suggesting adding them because the USSR used them at a limited capacity. Originally posted by shipdesignerdude:Copy paste is the worse case scenario (In theory), where a nation has no vehicles it could possibly add to balance out a lineup. They would also require little effort to be implemented into the Soviet tree. Since they're current in game counterparts have a RB BR of 4.0, these two vehicles would go very nicely together in Russia's growing 4.0 lineup. These two vehicles saw more combat in Soviet service than their later model cousins currently in game, being the M4A2 76(W) and Spitfire Mk. The Soviets used the name Emcha for the tank, which stands for M4 in Russian. In the case of the M4A2, it was well loved by Soviet tank crews and saw combat from its first arrival, to the end of the war. It also had a nasty habit of being mistaken for a Bf-109. While Soviet pilots typically enjoyed flying the Spitfire, it wasn't well suited for the harsh environment of the eastern front. Vb was the first of the type to be received by the Soviets and saw combat around Kuban in 1943. Vb and M4A2 are great additions for historical reasons. Such as, would anyone ever pay for a premium M10?Īlso, the Spitfire Mk. But in the case of these two vehicles and other lend lease stuff, they wouldn't make much sense being added as premiums. I know that many people don't like the idea of copy/paste vehicles. ![]() They would essentially be the exact same as their counterparts in the US and UK trees, with the exception of the M4A2 not having any track armor. ![]() Vb and M4A2 would be great additions to the standard Soviet tech tree.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |